Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Austin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 08:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:05 (From 51:59 to 47:54) | 50.8% |
| Rowing | 01:02 (From 06:32 to 05:30) | 12.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:01 (From 03:20 to 02:19) | 12.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:58 (From 03:48 to 02:50) | 12.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:54 (From 06:50 to 05:56) | 11.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 (From 05:15 to 05:13) | 0.4% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:07 to 04:07) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:04 to 05:04) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:36 to 04:36) | 0.0% |
| Lalaine Byrd | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:44 | 00:00 | 05:27 +00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:15 | 05:44 | 05:16 -00:01 | 05:27 +00:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 10:59 | 05:50 -00:18 | 10:43 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:48 | 16:31 | 02:56 +00:52 | 16:33 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 20:19 | 06:08 +00:00 | 19:29 +00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 06:50 | 26:27 | 06:13 +00:37 | 25:37 +00:50 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 33:17 | 06:09 +00:20 | 31:50 +01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:07 | 39:46 | 07:02 -02:55 | 37:59 +01:47 |
| Running 5 | 07:21 | 43:53 | 06:20 +01:01 | 45:01 -01:08 |
| Rowing | 06:32 | 51:14 | 05:34 +00:58 | 51:21 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 06:50 | 57:46 | 06:12 +00:38 | 56:55 +00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:20 | 01:04:36 | 02:25 +00:55 | 01:03:07 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 06:41 | 01:07:56 | 06:11 +00:30 | 01:05:32 +02:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:04 | 01:14:37 | 05:24 -00:20 | 01:11:43 +02:54 |
| Running 8 | 07:14 | 01:19:41 | 06:49 +00:25 | 01:17:07 +02:34 |
| Wall Balls | 04:36 | 01:26:55 | 06:09 -01:33 | 01:23:56 +02:59 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:38:02 | 07:57 -01:26 | 01:38:02 |
10. Running 4: Lalaine's split time for the fourth running segment was 00:06:29, which was 00:14 slower than the average. To improve her performance in this segment, she should focus on maintaining a consistent pace and building her endurance. Incorporating interval training, tempo runs, and long runs into her training routine can help her improve her running speed and endurance. She should also work on her running form and technique to avoid unnecessary energy expenditure.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mareen Boschem | 2022 Essen | 01:37:39 | |
| Brenda Zepeda Pozos | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:37:59 | |
| Griet Biesemans | 2024 Stockholm | 01:38:30 | |
| Alva Ho | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:38:26 | |
| Naomi Dale | 2022 London | 01:38:12 | |
| Demi Van Aken | 2025 Cologne | 01:37:44 | |
| Hannah Nicol | 2024 London | 01:38:20 | |
| Jade Hunt | 2023 Singapore | 01:37:51 | |
| Lucy Finneron | 2024 Madrid | 01:38:24 | |
| Megan Fitzgibbon | 2023 Valencia | 01:38:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas Lalaine Byrd, Lisa Paul | 01:24:31 | |
| 2022 Chicago Lalaine Byrd | 01:37:22 | |
| 2021 Chicago Lalaine Byrd | 01:36:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Lalaine Byrd
