Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 461 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 03:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:29 (From 34:03 to 31:34) | 68.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:41 (From 02:25 to 01:44) | 18.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:13 (From 04:05 to 03:52) | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 (From 01:36 to 01:25) | 5.0% |
| Rowing | 00:05 (From 04:16 to 04:11) | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 03:51 to 03:51) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 02:59 to 02:59) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 02:17 to 02:17) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:09 to 03:09) | 0.0% |
| Ashton Du Plessis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 03:36 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:51 | 03:41 | 04:02 -00:11 | 03:36 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:08 | 07:32 | 03:47 +00:21 | 07:38 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 11:40 | 02:10 +00:15 | 11:25 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 04:29 | 14:05 | 03:58 +00:31 | 13:35 +00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 02:59 | 18:34 | 03:19 -00:20 | 17:33 +01:01 |
| Running 4 | 04:22 | 21:33 | 03:58 +00:24 | 20:52 +00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:17 | 25:55 | 03:14 -00:57 | 24:50 +01:05 |
| Running 5 | 04:19 | 28:12 | 04:04 +00:15 | 28:04 +00:08 |
| Rowing | 04:16 | 32:31 | 04:14 +00:02 | 32:08 +00:23 |
| Running 6 | 04:14 | 36:47 | 04:00 +00:14 | 36:22 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 41:01 | 01:34 +00:02 | 40:22 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:28 | 42:37 | 04:01 +00:27 | 41:56 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:09 | 47:05 | 03:18 -00:09 | 45:57 +01:08 |
| Running 8 | 04:25 | 50:14 | 04:09 +00:16 | 49:15 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 04:05 | 54:39 | 04:08 -00:03 | 53:24 +01:15 |
| Roxzone | 02:57 | 01:01:34 | 04:02 -01:05 | 01:01:34 |
In terms of his splits, it is important to note that his total running time of 00:34:03 was 02:59 slower than the average. This indicates that there is room for improvement in his running performance. However, it is worth mentioning that his best running lap was 00:03:41, which was only 00:14 slower than the average. This highlights his potential and ability to perform well in shorter running segments.
To improve his running performance, Ashton should focus on specific drills and techniques to enhance his speed and endurance. Incorporating interval training sessions, such as high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or fartlek runs, can help improve his overall running pace. Additionally, implementing hill repeats and tempo runs can develop his strength and endurance for longer distances. Strength training exercises targeting the lower body, such as squats, lunges, and plyometric exercises, can also improve his running performance.
For the segments involving sled pushes and sled pulls, Ashton performed exceptionally well, with times faster than the average. However, to further enhance his performance in these areas, he can focus on building lower body strength and explosive power. Exercises such as deadlifts, hip thrusts, and power cleans can help improve his strength and power output during sled pushes and pulls.
During the race, Ashton should also prioritize efficient transitions between exercise zones. The Roxzone time of 00:02:57 was faster than the average, indicating that he managed his transitions well. However, focusing on improving overall fitness and transition times can further enhance his performance in this aspect.
Additionally, Ashton should consider incorporating specific training sessions that mimic the race conditions. This can involve practicing the race segments individually or combining them into a full-length workout to simulate the demands of the race. By familiarizing himself with the exercises and their transitions, he can optimize his performance and reduce any potential time lost.
Overall, Ashton Du Plessis demonstrated impressive athleticism and potential in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, implementing specific training strategies, and optimizing his race strategies, he can continue to excel and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Elliot Parry | 2025 Manchester | 01:01:47 | |
| Zachary Marino | 2025 Washington D.C. Open North American Championships | 01:01:22 | |
| Sean Mc Anallen | 2024 Paris | 01:02:00 | |
| Jamie Ayshford | 2024 Manchester | 01:01:43 | |
| Antoine Vidal | 2025 Toulouse | 01:01:54 | |
| Joshua Heaton | 2025 Manchester | 01:01:45 | |
| Robin Soppa | 2025 Karlsruhe | 01:02:02 | |
| Robert Atwell | 2024 New York | 01:01:46 | |
| Sam Craig | 2023 London | 01:01:35 | |
| Santiago MartÃn Romo Parra | 2025 Valencia | 01:01:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Vienna Ashton Du Plessis | 01:03:19 | |
| 2022 Frankfurt Ashton Du Plessis | 01:13:01 | |
| 2021 Hamburg Ashton Du Plessis | 01:09:26 | |
| 2021 Stuttgart Ashton Du Plessis | 01:10:16 | |
| 2021 Leipzig Ashton Du Plessis | 01:08:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Ashton Du Plessis
