Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 06:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:05 (From 35:51 to 33:46) | 34.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:06 (From 03:07 to 02:01) | 18.1% |
| BBJ | 00:57 (From 04:27 to 03:30) | 15.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:52 (From 04:19 to 03:27) | 14.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:41 (From 05:06 to 04:25) | 11.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 (From 04:26 to 04:03) | 6.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 (From 01:35 to 01:34) | 0.3% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:16 to 04:16) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:37 to 03:37) | 0.0% |
| Mark Mcveigh | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:48 | 00:00 | 03:58 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 02:48 | 04:12 +00:14 | 03:58 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 07:14 | 04:09 +00:24 | 08:10 -00:56 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 11:47 | 02:27 +00:40 | 12:19 -00:32 |
| Running 3 | 04:39 | 14:54 | 04:25 +00:14 | 14:46 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:19 | 19:33 | 03:55 +00:24 | 19:11 +00:22 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 23:52 | 04:25 +00:20 | 23:06 +00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:27 | 28:37 | 04:01 +00:26 | 27:31 +01:06 |
| Running 5 | 04:50 | 33:04 | 04:32 +00:18 | 31:32 +01:32 |
| Rowing | 04:16 | 37:54 | 04:27 -00:11 | 36:04 +01:50 |
| Running 6 | 04:46 | 42:10 | 04:26 +00:20 | 40:31 +01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 46:56 | 01:48 -00:13 | 44:57 +01:59 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 48:31 | 04:27 +00:18 | 46:45 +01:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:37 | 53:16 | 04:02 -00:25 | 51:12 +02:04 |
| Running 8 | 04:48 | 56:53 | 04:43 +00:05 | 55:14 +01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:06 | 01:01:41 | 04:58 +00:08 | 59:57 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 03:21 | 01:10:01 | 05:06 -01:45 | 01:10:01 |
In terms of overall time, Mark completed the race in 01:10:01. While this is a strong finish time, it is important to note that his total running time of 00:35:51 was 01:16 slower than the average. This indicates that there is room for improvement in his running performance.
To address the running segments, Mark should incorporate specific running drills and exercises into his training routine. This will help him improve his speed, endurance, and overall running performance. Interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs can all be beneficial for enhancing his running capabilities. Additionally, focusing on strengthening the muscles used in running, such as the quadriceps, hamstrings, and calves, through exercises like squats, lunges, and calf raises, can improve his running performance.
For the Burpees Broad Jump segment, Mark should work on improving his speed and explosiveness during the burpees and broad jumps. Plyometric exercises, such as box jumps and squat jumps, can help him develop power and explosiveness. Additionally, incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts with burpees and broad jumps can improve his efficiency in this segment.
Regarding the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, Mark should focus on improving his upper body and core strength. This can be done through exercises like push-ups, pull-ups, and planks. Additionally, practicing proper technique and form for the Ski Erg and Sled Push can help him optimize his efficiency in these segments.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Mark Mcveigh can further enhance his performance in future Hyrox races and continue to excel in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maurice Braun | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:09:36 | |
| Matthew Betts | 2024 Birmingham | 01:09:46 | |
| Pierre Elain | 2025 Miami Beach | 01:09:58 | |
| Steffen Mühl | 2022 Hamburg | 01:09:44 | |
| Damien Raquidel | 2025 Paris | 01:10:20 | |
| Alexzander Fasulkey | 2025 Atlanta | 01:09:57 | |
| Liam Heffer | 2025 London | 01:09:50 | |
| Markus Krause | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:09:51 | |
| James Barlow | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:10:07 | |
| Dan Walker | 2024 London | 01:10:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Nice Mark Mcveigh | 01:19:13 | |
| 2024 Glasgow Mark Mcveigh, Rhiannon Russell | 01:09:42 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester Mark Mcveigh | 01:17:41 | |
| 2023 Glasgow Mark Mcveigh | 01:12:48 | |
| 2023 Manchester Mark Mcveigh | 01:06:31 | |
| 2022 London Mark Mcveigh, Rhiannon Russell | 01:15:15 | |
| 2022 Birmingham Mark Mcveigh | 01:05:39 | |
| 2022 London Mark Mcveigh | 01:12:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Mark Mcveigh
