Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Stockholm using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1 similar athlete.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 03:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:47 (From 02:55 to 02:08) | 25.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 (From 03:55 to 03:09) | 24.6% |
| BBJ | 00:45 (From 03:34 to 02:49) | 24.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 (From 03:59 to 03:39) | 10.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 (From 01:47 to 01:34) | 7.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 (From 04:20 to 04:11) | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:07 (From 04:30 to 04:23) | 3.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 03:13 to 03:13) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 30:43 to 30:43) | 0.0% |
| Megan Jacoby | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 04:01 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:53 | 04:10 +00:10 | 04:01 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 03:47 | 08:13 | 03:36 +00:11 | 08:11 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 12:00 | 02:34 +00:21 | 11:47 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 03:44 | 14:55 | 03:48 -00:04 | 14:21 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 03:59 | 18:39 | 03:36 +00:23 | 18:09 +00:30 |
| Running 4 | 03:35 | 22:38 | 03:46 -00:11 | 21:45 +00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:34 | 26:13 | 02:32 +01:02 | 25:31 +00:42 |
| Running 5 | 03:45 | 29:47 | 03:50 -00:05 | 28:03 +01:44 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 33:32 | 04:12 +00:18 | 31:53 +01:39 |
| Running 6 | 04:01 | 38:02 | 03:47 +00:14 | 36:05 +01:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 42:03 | 01:36 +00:11 | 39:52 +02:11 |
| Running 7 | 03:51 | 43:50 | 03:46 +00:05 | 41:28 +02:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:55 | 47:41 | 02:43 +01:12 | 45:14 +02:27 |
| Running 8 | 04:11 | 51:36 | 03:48 +00:23 | 47:57 +03:39 |
| Wall Balls | 03:13 | 55:47 | 03:16 -00:03 | 51:45 +04:02 |
| Roxzone | 00:00 | 58:52 | 03:51 -03:51 | 58:52 |
In terms of running, Megan performed well with a total running time of 00:30:43, which is on par with the average. Her best running lap was completed in 00:03:35. This suggests that Megan has a strong running profile and should continue to train her strength to maintain her performance level.
In conclusion, Megan Jacoby demonstrated exceptional performance in the 2023 Stockholm Hyrox race. While her overall performance was outstanding, there are a few areas where she can make improvements. By focusing on specific drills and techniques to enhance her performance in the ski erg, sled pull, and rowing segments, Megan can further elevate her performance in future races. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing, transition efficiency, and mental strength training will contribute to her overall success in Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Megan Jacoby | 2023 Anaheim | 58:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Paris Lukas Storath, Megan Jacoby | 51:08 | |
| 2025 Cologne Lukas Storath, Megan Jacoby | 51:08 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam Megan Jacoby | 58:44 | |
| 2024 Nice Megan Jacoby | 59:59 | |
| 2024 Nice Megan Jacoby, Benjamin Burkhardt | 58:53 | |
| 2024 Nice Hunter Mcintyre, Ryan Kent, Lauren Rantala, Megan Jacoby | 50:55 | |
| 2024 Köln Lukas Storath, Ryan Kent, Linda Meier, Megan Jacoby | 49:19 | |
| 2024 Köln Linda Meier, Megan Jacoby | 55:02 | |
| 2024 Washington D.C. Megan Jacoby | 01:02:37 | |
| 2024 Washington D.C. Megan Jacoby, Benjamin Burkhardt | 58:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Megan Jacoby
