Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 91 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 01:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:06 (From 30:21 to 29:15) | 73.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:13 (From 04:10 to 03:57) | 14.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 (From 03:40 to 03:33) | 7.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 (From 03:47 to 03:45) | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 (From 02:11 to 02:09) | 2.2% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 02:21 to 02:21) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 03:45 to 03:45) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:23 to 01:23) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:02 to 03:02) | 0.0% |
| Tim Wenisch | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:17 | 00:00 | 03:17 +00:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:47 | 03:17 | 03:47 +00:00 | 03:17 +00:00 |
| Running 2 | 03:40 | 07:04 | 03:28 +00:12 | 07:04 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 10:44 | 02:29 -00:18 | 10:32 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 03:46 | 12:55 | 03:38 +00:08 | 13:01 -00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 03:40 | 16:41 | 03:30 +00:10 | 16:39 +00:02 |
| Running 4 | 03:49 | 20:21 | 03:40 +00:09 | 20:09 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:21 | 24:10 | 02:41 -00:20 | 23:49 +00:21 |
| Running 5 | 03:58 | 26:31 | 03:42 +00:16 | 26:30 +00:01 |
| Rowing | 03:45 | 30:29 | 03:58 -00:13 | 30:12 +00:17 |
| Running 6 | 03:50 | 34:14 | 03:40 +00:10 | 34:10 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:23 | 38:04 | 01:29 -00:06 | 37:50 +00:14 |
| Running 7 | 03:55 | 39:27 | 03:42 +00:13 | 39:19 +00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:02 | 43:22 | 03:10 -00:08 | 43:01 +00:21 |
| Running 8 | 04:10 | 46:24 | 04:01 +00:09 | 46:11 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 04:10 | 50:34 | 04:02 +00:08 | 50:12 +00:22 |
| Roxzone | 03:23 | 57:57 | 03:43 -00:20 | 57:57 |
In terms of pacing, Tim's overall running time of 00:30:21 was 01:16 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may have spent more time resting or taking longer transitions in the roxzone. To improve this segment, Tim should focus on enhancing his overall fitness level and reducing his transition time.
In terms of transitions in the roxzone, Tim should aim to minimize his resting time and ensure smooth transitions between exercises. Practicing efficient transitions during training sessions can help him become faster and more efficient during the race.
Overall, Tim Wenisch's performance in the Hyrox race was impressive, showcasing his strong fitness and determination. By focusing on the identified areas for improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Afan Humphries | 2024 Köln | 58:10 | |
| Joao Rosa De Almeida | 2024 Stockholm | 57:58 | |
| Aitor Lizarazu | 2024 Bordeaux | 58:02 | |
| Jamie Pratt | 2025 Berlin | 58:06 | |
| Charlie Botterill | 2025 Rotterdam | 57:47 | |
| Joao Rosa De Almeida | 2025 Cologne | 57:44 | |
| Tiago Lousa | 2024 Berlin | 57:37 | |
| John Carlisle | 2024 Stockholm | 58:25 | |
| Sean Mc Laughlin | 2025 Glasgow | 58:22 | |
| Jannik Czapla | 2025 Berlin | 57:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 World Championships Tim Wenisch | 53:53 | |
| 2025 World Championships Tim Wenisch, Jannik Czapla, Viola Oberländer, Linda Meier | 50:52 | |
| 2025 World Championships Tim Wenisch, Jannik Czapla | 50:24 | |
| 2025 Paris Tim Wenisch, Antje Hardes | 54:16 | |
| 2025 Paris Tim Wenisch, Jannik Czapla | 50:42 | |
| 2025 Cologne Tim Wenisch, Antje Hardes | 54:16 | |
| 2025 Glasgow Tim Wenisch | 54:30 | |
| 2025 Las Vegas Tim Wenisch | 58:32 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt Tim Wenisch, Zeliha Puls | 57:08 | |
| 2024 Hong Kong Tim Wenisch | 56:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Tim Wenisch
