Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 146 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 03:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:44 (From 05:18 to 03:34) | 45.4% |
| Sled Push | 01:27 (From 03:35 to 02:08) | 38.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 (From 03:30 to 03:07) | 10.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 (From 04:13 to 03:59) | 6.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 (From 03:45 to 03:44) | 0.4% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 01:52 to 01:52) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 03:56 to 03:56) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 00:00 to 00:00) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 28:58 to 28:58) | 0.0% |
| James Kelly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 03:23 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:45 | 03:42 | 03:50 -00:05 | 03:23 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 03:22 | 07:27 | 03:34 -00:12 | 07:13 +00:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 10:49 | 02:35 +01:00 | 10:47 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 03:32 | 14:24 | 03:47 -00:15 | 13:22 +01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 17:56 | 03:41 +01:37 | 17:09 +00:47 |
| Running 4 | 03:38 | 23:14 | 03:48 -00:10 | 20:50 +02:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:52 | 26:52 | 02:48 -00:56 | 24:38 +02:14 |
| Running 5 | 03:45 | 28:44 | 03:52 -00:07 | 27:26 +01:18 |
| Rowing | 03:56 | 32:29 | 04:02 -00:06 | 31:18 +01:11 |
| Running 6 | 03:37 | 36:25 | 03:48 -00:11 | 35:20 +01:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 40:02 | 01:33 -01:33 | 39:08 +00:54 |
| Running 7 | 03:39 | 40:02 | 03:51 -00:12 | 40:41 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:30 | 43:41 | 03:14 +00:16 | 44:32 -00:51 |
| Running 8 | 03:48 | 47:11 | 04:02 -00:14 | 47:46 -00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 04:13 | 50:59 | 04:15 -00:02 | 51:48 -00:49 |
| Roxzone | 03:05 | 59:53 | 03:50 -00:45 | 59:53 |
In terms of his splits, James demonstrated great strength in the running segments, with a total running time of 00:28:58, which was 01:33 faster than the average time. This suggests that James has a strong running profile and excels in endurance-based activities. His best running lap of 00:03:22 further emphasizes his running abilities.
To improve performance in the Sled Pull and Sled Push, James should work on increasing his overall strength and power. Incorporating exercises such as deadlifts, squats, and kettlebell swings into his training routine can help develop the necessary strength for these segments. Additionally, practicing proper technique and form during the sled pull and push will contribute to more efficient movement and reduced time loss.
For the Sandbag Lunges segment, James should focus on improving his endurance and leg strength. Exercises such as lunges, step-ups, and Bulgarian split squats can help strengthen the muscles involved in lunging movements. Implementing interval training and incorporating lunges into his running routine can also improve his performance in this segment.
In terms of Running 1, James was 00:19 slower than the average time. To improve his performance in this segment, he should focus on his running technique and speed. Incorporating interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs into his training routine can help increase his running speed and efficiency. Additionally, working on his running form, such as maintaining a proper posture and stride, can contribute to improved performance in this segment.
Overall, James Kelly's performance in the 2022 Birmingham HYROX race was exceptional, showcasing his strength and endurance. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies, James can further enhance his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Lautwein | 2024 Frankfurt | 59:39 | |
| Alan Cao | 2025 Switzerland | 59:58 | |
| Martin Michelius | 2022 Maastricht | 01:00:21 | |
| Dieter Schwarzkopf | 2022 Maastricht | 01:00:08 | |
| Greyson Kilgore | 2024 Anaheim | 59:46 | |
| Luke Brotherton | 2025 Brisbane | 59:26 | |
| Krystian Poremba | 2024 Katowice | 59:54 | |
| Tom Hogan | 2024 Berlin | 59:59 | |
| Lukas Storath | 2018 Essen | 01:00:22 | |
| Stephen Pelkofer | 2025 Houston | 59:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Warsaw James Kelly | 01:34:04 | |
| 2025 Malaga James Kelly, Jamie Knox | 01:21:46 | |
| 2025 Houston James Kelly, Jake Dearden | 50:04 | |
| 2025 Glasgow James Kelly | 53:22 | |
| 2025 Glasgow James Kelly | 01:35:59 | |
| 2025 Glasgow James Kelly, Paul Geoghegan | 01:16:20 | |
| 2025 Las Vegas Anthony Peressini, James Kelly | 54:45 | |
| 2025 Las Vegas James Kelly | 57:35 | |
| 2025 Manchester James Kelly, Heather Leckie | 01:35:27 | |
| 2024 Hong Kong James Kelly | 55:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
James Kelly
