Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 144 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 02:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:53 (From 03:28 to 02:35) | 38.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 (From 04:52 to 04:15) | 26.8% |
| Run Total | 00:23 (From 34:04 to 33:41) | 16.7% |
| BBJ | 00:19 (From 03:43 to 03:24) | 13.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 (From 01:53 to 01:47) | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:20 to 04:20) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:32 to 04:32) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:09 to 03:09) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:05 to 04:05) | 0.0% |
| Rebecca Naether | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 03:47 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:52 | 04:26 -00:06 | 03:47 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 03:59 | 08:12 | 04:02 -00:03 | 08:13 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 12:11 | 03:02 +00:26 | 12:15 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:24 | 15:39 | 04:18 +00:06 | 15:17 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 20:03 | 04:38 +00:14 | 19:35 +00:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:23 | 24:55 | 04:19 +00:04 | 24:13 +00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:43 | 29:18 | 03:41 +00:02 | 28:32 +00:46 |
| Running 5 | 04:21 | 33:01 | 04:23 -00:02 | 32:13 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 37:22 | 04:36 -00:04 | 36:36 +00:46 |
| Running 6 | 04:16 | 41:54 | 04:21 -00:05 | 41:12 +00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 46:10 | 01:58 -00:05 | 45:33 +00:37 |
| Running 7 | 04:18 | 48:03 | 04:22 -00:04 | 47:31 +00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:09 | 52:21 | 03:50 -00:41 | 51:53 +00:28 |
| Running 8 | 04:35 | 55:30 | 04:34 +00:01 | 55:43 -00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 04:05 | 01:00:05 | 04:30 -00:25 | 01:00:17 -00:12 |
| Roxzone | 05:15 | 01:09:17 | 04:30 +00:45 | 01:09:17 |
Rebecca's overall time of 01:09:17 reflects her exceptional fitness level and dedication to training. Her total running time of 00:34:04 is particularly noteworthy, as it is 01:42 faster than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she has a strong running profile and excelled in the running segments of the race.
Splits Analysis:
Analyzing Rebecca's splits, we can see that she performed exceptionally well in most segments, consistently outperforming the average time. Her best running lap time of 00:03:52 showcases her speed and efficiency in running. Additionally, she performed impressively in the Ski Erg, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Farmers Carry, Running 7, and Sandbag Lunges segments, consistently outperforming the average time.
However, there are a few segments where Rebecca lost time compared to the average. The Sled Push segment took her 00:53 longer than the average, the Sled Pull took her 00:36 longer, Wall Balls took her 00:30 longer, and the Roxzone took her 00:28 longer. These segments should be the focus of her improvement efforts.
Additionally, she should continue to focus on building both her running and strength profiles to maintain a well-rounded performance. Incorporating interval training, long-distance runs, and strength training into her routine will help her continue to excel in both aspects of the race.
In conclusion, Rebecca Naether demonstrated outstanding performance in the 2023 Hamburg Hyrox race. While she excelled in many segments, there are a few areas where she can make improvements to further enhance her performance. By focusing on strengthening specific muscle groups, improving technique, and maintaining an efficient pace, Rebecca can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Camilla Massa | 2022 Dallas | 01:09:44 | |
| Annika Laue | 2022 Leipzig | 01:09:44 | |
| Jessica Short | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:09:40 | |
| Nathalie Stewart | 2024 Dublin | 01:09:28 | |
| Aoife Fay | 2024 Nice | 01:08:47 | |
| Merel Klifman | 2025 Heerenveen | 01:08:50 | |
| Sarah Keshishian | 2024 Nice | 01:09:05 | |
| Jodie Gregson | 2025 London | 01:09:37 | |
| Anna Rogers | 2025 London | 01:09:13 | |
| Zeliha Puls | 2025 Barcelona | 01:09:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Barcelona Rebecca Naether | 01:12:27 | |
| 2025 Cologne Rebecca Naether | 01:08:17 | |
| 2025 Karlsruhe Rebecca Naether | 01:07:47 | |
| 2025 Vienna Rebecca Naether | 01:00:45 | |
| 2025 Maastricht Rebecca Naether | 01:05:44 | |
| 2025 Manchester Rebecca Naether | 01:08:35 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt Rebecca Naether | 01:10:36 | |
| 2024 Hamburg Rebecca Naether | 01:07:15 | |
| 2024 Hamburg Elte Hupkes, Rebecca Naether | 54:24 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam Rebecca Naether | 01:04:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Rebecca Naether
