Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 73 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 01:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 00:44 (From 30:28 to 29:44) | 44.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 (From 02:46 to 02:07) | 39.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 (From 01:33 to 01:25) | 8.0% |
| Rowing | 00:06 (From 04:05 to 03:59) | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 (From 03:47 to 03:44) | 3.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 03:18 to 03:18) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 02:26 to 02:26) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 02:54 to 02:54) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 03:14 to 03:14) | 0.0% |
| Colin Stiefer | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:03 | 00:00 | 03:23 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:47 | 03:03 | 03:47 +00:00 | 03:23 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 03:46 | 06:50 | 03:30 +00:16 | 07:10 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 10:36 | 02:31 +00:15 | 10:40 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:00 | 13:22 | 03:40 +00:20 | 13:11 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 03:18 | 17:22 | 03:31 -00:13 | 16:51 +00:31 |
| Running 4 | 03:53 | 20:40 | 03:42 +00:11 | 20:22 +00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:26 | 24:33 | 02:37 -00:11 | 24:04 +00:29 |
| Running 5 | 03:56 | 26:59 | 03:46 +00:10 | 26:41 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 04:05 | 30:55 | 03:59 +00:06 | 30:27 +00:28 |
| Running 6 | 03:54 | 35:00 | 03:42 +00:12 | 34:26 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:33 | 38:54 | 01:30 +00:03 | 38:08 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 03:58 | 40:27 | 03:45 +00:13 | 39:38 +00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:54 | 44:25 | 03:08 -00:14 | 43:23 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 04:02 | 47:19 | 03:58 +00:04 | 46:31 +00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 03:14 | 51:21 | 04:08 -00:54 | 50:29 +00:52 |
| Roxzone | 03:47 | 58:14 | 03:37 +00:10 | 58:14 |
In conclusion, Colin Stiefer showcased his athleticism and dedication in the 2023 Chicago Hyrox race. While his overall performance was impressive, there are areas where he can further improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition times, and implementing effective race strategies, Colin can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Lautwein | 2024 Maastricht | 58:00 | |
| Tobias Lautwein | 2022 Basel | 58:10 | |
| Emilio Aguayo | 2025 Valencia | 58:38 | |
| Colin Stiefer | 2024 Chicago | 58:13 | |
| Sadiq Elfitouri | 2024 Köln | 57:44 | |
| Danny Rae | 2024 Berlin | 58:10 | |
| Sean Noble | 2024 Frankfurt | 57:46 | |
| Fabian Eisenlauer | 2024 Amsterdam | 58:40 | |
| John Carlisle | 2025 Glasgow | 58:25 | |
| Jonathon Wynn | 2023 Madrid | 58:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Houston Colin Stiefer, Greyson Kilgore | 52:00 | |
| 2025 Las Vegas Colin Stiefer | 59:27 | |
| 2024 Chicago Colin Stiefer | 58:13 | |
| 2024 Toronto Colin Stiefer | 59:45 | |
| 2024 Toronto Colin Stiefer, Terra Jackson | 57:05 | |
| 2024 Nice Colin Stiefer | 01:01:54 | |
| 2024 Nice Colin Stiefer, Taylor Haney | 56:49 | |
| 2024 Washington D.C. Colin Stiefer | 59:05 | |
| 2024 Fort Lauderdale Colin Stiefer, Melody Berrong | 57:01 | |
| 2024 Fort Lauderdale Joseph Roberto, Dylan Scott, Colin Stiefer, Jack Driscoll | 54:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Colin Stiefer
