Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 398 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 03:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:15 (From 03:41 to 02:26) | 35.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:50 (From 04:47 to 03:57) | 23.6% |
| Run Total | 00:46 (From 31:23 to 30:37) | 21.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 (From 03:42 to 03:26) | 7.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 (From 01:46 to 01:32) | 6.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 (From 04:35 to 04:24) | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 03:23 to 03:23) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 02:48 to 02:48) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 03:57 to 03:57) | 0.0% |
| Jannik Czapla | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:21 | 00:00 | 03:37 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:23 | 03:21 | 03:55 -00:32 | 03:37 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 03:46 | 06:44 | 03:38 +00:08 | 07:32 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:41 | 10:30 | 02:51 +00:50 | 11:10 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 03:57 | 14:11 | 03:52 +00:05 | 14:01 +00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 18:08 | 04:14 +00:33 | 17:53 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 03:58 | 22:55 | 03:54 +00:04 | 22:07 +00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:48 | 26:53 | 03:06 -00:18 | 26:01 +00:52 |
| Running 5 | 04:03 | 29:41 | 03:58 +00:05 | 29:07 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 03:57 | 33:44 | 04:08 -00:11 | 33:05 +00:39 |
| Running 6 | 04:02 | 37:41 | 03:55 +00:07 | 37:13 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 41:43 | 01:40 +00:06 | 41:08 +00:35 |
| Running 7 | 03:56 | 43:29 | 03:58 -00:02 | 42:48 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:42 | 47:25 | 03:38 +00:04 | 46:46 +00:39 |
| Running 8 | 04:25 | 51:07 | 04:17 +00:08 | 50:24 +00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 04:35 | 55:32 | 04:43 -00:08 | 54:41 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 03:41 | 01:03:39 | 04:15 -00:34 | 01:03:39 |
Jannik's overall time of 01:03:39 is commendable, especially considering his young age and the competitive field. He displayed great speed and endurance throughout the race, as evidenced by his total running time of 00:31:23, which is 00:34 faster than the average. This indicates that Jannik has a strong running profile and excelled in this aspect of the race.
To improve in the Sled Push segment, Jannik should focus on increasing his strength and power. This can be achieved through specific training exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and sled pushes. Incorporating these exercises into his training routine will help him develop the necessary muscular strength and endurance required for the Sled Push segment.
Similarly, for the Sled Pull segment, Jannik should work on improving his upper body strength and grip strength. Exercises such as pull-ups, rows, and farmer's carries can help target these areas. By incorporating these exercises into his training regimen, Jannik will be able to enhance his performance in the Sled Pull segment.
The Sandbag Lunges segment also showed room for improvement. To excel in this segment, Jannik should focus on improving his lower body strength and stability. Exercises like lunges, squats, and step-ups can help strengthen the muscles involved in this movement. It is also crucial for Jannik to practice proper form and technique during lunges to maximize efficiency and minimize time lost.
Additionally, Jannik should prioritize efficient transitions between the exercise zones (Roxzone). While he performed well in this aspect, with a Roxzone time of 00:03:41, which is 00:34 faster than the average, there is still room for improvement. By working on his overall fitness and specifically targeting his transition time, Jannik can further reduce his Roxzone time and gain a competitive edge.
In summary, Jannik Czapla displayed an impressive performance in the Hyrox race in München. His strong running profile and overall rank highlight his potential as a fitness athlete. By focusing on improving the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges segments, and implementing effective race strategies, Jannik can further enhance his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Steven Moharic | 2024 Sydney | 01:03:22 | |
| Chris Moulam Jones | 2025 Berlin | 01:03:26 | |
| Simon Passmore | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:04:09 | |
| Miles Kitchen | 2025 Berlin | 01:03:45 | |
| Billy Blower | 2025 Cardiff | 01:04:07 | |
| Louis Pavis | 2025 World Championships | 01:04:01 | |
| Sebastian Ifversen | 2023 Stockholm | 01:03:38 | |
| Lukas Storath | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:03:52 | |
| Jamie De Abreu | 2025 World Championships | 01:03:16 | |
| Charlie Botterill | 2025 Katowice | 01:03:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 World Championships Tim Wenisch, Jannik Czapla, Viola Oberländer, Linda Meier | 50:52 | |
| 2025 World Championships Tim Wenisch, Jannik Czapla | 50:24 | |
| 2025 Berlin Jannik Czapla | 57:30 | |
| 2025 Barcelona Jannik Czapla | 59:51 | |
| 2025 Paris Tim Wenisch, Jannik Czapla | 50:42 | |
| 2025 Glasgow Jannik Czapla | 56:18 | |
| 2025 Las Vegas Jannik Czapla | 01:03:11 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt Florian Staudt, Jannik Czapla | 54:50 | |
| 2024 Hong Kong Jannik Czapla | 59:10 | |
| 2024 Hamburg Jannik Czapla | 56:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Jannik Czapla
