Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 597 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 01:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| BBJ | 00:48 (From 03:45 to 02:57) | 52.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 (From 02:02 to 01:44) | 19.8% |
| Run Total | 00:15 (From 31:33 to 31:18) | 16.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 (From 01:33 to 01:25) | 8.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 (From 03:13 to 03:11) | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 03:47 to 03:47) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 02:57 to 02:57) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:00 to 04:00) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 03:39 to 03:39) | 0.0% |
| John Leonard | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:19 | 00:00 | 03:35 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:47 | 04:19 | 04:03 -00:16 | 03:35 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 03:42 | 08:06 | 03:46 -00:04 | 07:38 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:02 | 11:48 | 02:13 -00:11 | 11:24 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 03:53 | 13:50 | 03:57 -00:04 | 13:37 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 02:57 | 17:43 | 03:23 -00:26 | 17:34 +00:09 |
| Running 4 | 03:57 | 20:40 | 03:57 +00:00 | 20:57 -00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:45 | 24:37 | 03:18 +00:27 | 24:54 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 03:55 | 28:22 | 04:03 -00:08 | 28:12 +00:10 |
| Rowing | 04:00 | 32:17 | 04:15 -00:15 | 32:15 +00:02 |
| Running 6 | 03:53 | 36:17 | 03:59 -00:06 | 36:30 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:33 | 40:10 | 01:35 -00:02 | 40:29 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 03:45 | 41:43 | 04:00 -00:15 | 42:04 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:13 | 45:28 | 03:23 -00:10 | 46:04 -00:36 |
| Running 8 | 04:11 | 48:41 | 04:13 -00:02 | 49:27 -00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 03:39 | 52:52 | 04:11 -00:32 | 53:40 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 05:41 | 01:02:05 | 04:14 +01:27 | 01:02:05 |
John Leonard's performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race was exceptional. With an overall ranking of 22 out of 4107 athletes, he demonstrated superior fitness and skills. John was notably faster than the average in the total running time by 35 seconds, indicating a strong runner's profile. However, his pacing in the initial running segment was slower than the average, suggesting the need for strategic pacing adjustments in future races.
Roxzone was identified as a significant area of improvement for John, where he was 1:59 slower than the 25th percentile. This suggests that he may have spent more time resting or transitioning between exercise zones. To improve his performance in this area, John could focus on improving his overall fitness level and reducing transition times. Interval training could be beneficial here, alternating between high-intensity exercises and brief periods of recovery to boost endurance and speed.
Burpees Broad Jump was another segment where John's performance was slower than the average by 33 seconds. Enhancements in explosive power and coordination could help improve his performance in this segment. Plyometric exercises that enhance power and agility can be beneficial.
Considering his exceptional running speed, John could prioritize maintaining a steady running pace throughout the race. He could aim to start slower in the initial running segments to conserve energy for later stages. Additionally, focusing on swift transitions between exercise zones can also contribute to improved overall time.
Another potential strategy could be to optimize recovery periods. Active recovery, such as walking or slow jogging instead of complete rest, could help maintain a higher overall pace.
Lastly, considering his slower performance in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, John might benefit from incorporating more plyometric training into his routine to enhance his power and agility, which could improve his performance in similar high-intensity segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnathan Pewtner | 2023 Birmingham | 01:02:23 | |
| Torsten Dahnke | 2024 Berlin | 01:02:29 | |
| Vincent Bousquieres | 2023 Maastricht | 01:02:03 | |
| Marks Oliver | 2025 Taipei | 01:01:42 | |
| Steven Beattie | 2024 Manchester | 01:02:09 | |
| Fredrik Orrsveden | 2024 Stockholm | 01:02:03 | |
| Lukas Stimmelmayr | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:01:36 | |
| Karim Hegazy | 2024 Singapore | 01:01:47 | |
| Frazer Neate | 2025 Brisbane | 01:02:03 | |
| Robert Atwell | 2024 New York | 01:01:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Manchester John Leonard | 01:06:03 | |
| 2024 Malaga John Leonard, Martin Dickey | 01:43:00 | |
| 2024 Manchester John Leonard, Kirsty Walker | 01:00:35 | |
| 2024 Manchester John Leonard, Lewis Colbert | 58:18 | |
| 2023 Dublin John Leonard | 01:08:21 | |
| 2023 Birmingham John Leonard, Jack Curren | 55:24 | |
| 2022 London John Leonard | 01:05:07 | |
| 2022 Manchester John Leonard | 01:07:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
John Leonard
