Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 320 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 03:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 (From 36:48 to 34:57) | 53.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 (From 04:03 to 02:55) | 32.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 (From 03:57 to 03:41) | 7.7% |
| BBJ | 00:09 (From 03:46 to 03:37) | 4.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 (From 01:46 to 01:42) | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:28 to 04:28) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:33 to 04:33) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:29 to 01:29) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:04 to 03:04) | 0.0% |
| Emily Robertson | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 04:01 +00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:32 | 04:39 -00:11 | 04:01 +00:31 |
| Running 2 | 06:12 | 09:00 | 04:17 +01:55 | 08:40 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 01:46 | 15:12 | 02:06 -00:20 | 12:57 +02:15 |
| Running 3 | 04:16 | 16:58 | 04:27 -00:11 | 15:03 +01:55 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 21:14 | 04:07 -00:10 | 19:30 +01:44 |
| Running 4 | 04:16 | 25:11 | 04:28 -00:12 | 23:37 +01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:46 | 29:27 | 04:04 -00:18 | 28:05 +01:22 |
| Running 5 | 04:27 | 33:13 | 04:34 -00:07 | 32:09 +01:04 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 37:40 | 04:49 -00:16 | 36:43 +00:57 |
| Running 6 | 04:21 | 42:13 | 04:30 -00:09 | 41:32 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:29 | 46:34 | 01:46 -00:17 | 46:02 +00:32 |
| Running 7 | 04:17 | 48:03 | 04:28 -00:11 | 47:48 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:04 | 52:20 | 03:24 -00:20 | 52:16 +00:04 |
| Running 8 | 04:30 | 55:24 | 04:44 -00:14 | 55:40 -00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 04:03 | 59:54 | 03:39 +00:24 | 01:00:24 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 04:51 | 01:08:42 | 04:39 +00:12 | 01:08:42 |
Emily Robertson demonstrated exceptional performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing 13th overall and 3rd in her age group. Her overall time was 01:08:42, placing her in the top tier of the competition. Emily's performance was impressive across the board, with her strength and agility showing special prominence in the race. Her running performance, especially in the later stages of the race, however, was slightly below average, indicating an area of potential improvement.
Emily's total running time was 00:36:48, which was 00:46 slower than the average time. This suggests she is more of a strength athlete than a runner. Her pacing in the first four running segments indicates a steady start, with running times gradually increasing as the race progresses. This indicates that she managed to maintain a steady pace throughout the race without exhausting herself too early on.
Emily should consider pacing herself more effectively during the race, especially in the running segments. Starting out slightly slower and gradually increasing her pace could help her conserve energy for the later stages of the race. Also, focusing on maintaining a steady pace during the strength exercises could help her improve her overall time.
Additionally, Emily should consider working on her transition times between exercises. Spending less time transitioning could help her shave off valuable seconds from her overall time. Practicing transitions during training could help her become more efficient on race day.
Finally, Emily should continue to focus on her strength exercises, as these are clearly a strong point for her. However, incorporating more running and cardiovascular training into her routine could help her become a more well-rounded athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Pouderoijen | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:08:22 | |
| Carla Dilley | 2023 Dubai | 01:08:18 | |
| Teresa Garcia Garrido | 2025 Switzerland | 01:09:05 | |
| Hannah Veen | 2025 Auckland | 01:08:31 | |
| Darian Galloway | 2024 Berlin | 01:09:08 | |
| Nia Banfield | 2024 Birmingham | 01:09:08 | |
| Tina Tremmel | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:08:18 | |
| Liza Aarnink | 2025 Heerenveen | 01:08:28 | |
| Friederike Rueth | 2024 Köln | 01:08:13 | |
| Lena Werner | 2024 Köln | 01:09:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Berlin Emily Robertson | 01:08:49 | |
| 2025 Glasgow Emily Robertson | 01:09:05 | |
| 2025 Glasgow Emily Robertson, Katie Sharkey | 01:00:25 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt Emily Robertson | 01:06:53 | |
| 2024 Dublin Emily Robertson, Dylan Thomson | 01:00:24 | |
| 2024 Birmingham Emily Robertson, Brooke Douglas, Jessica Stewardson, Emma Swankie | 01:08:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Emily Robertson
